IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE,
SAKET COURTS, NEW DELHI
(Summary Suit under Order XXXVII , CPC)
SUIT NO._______________of 2015
IN THE MATTER OF:
M/S Myco Electricals Pvt. Ltd. …..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
M/s RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd. ..…DEFENDANT
INDEX
| S.NO. | Particulars | Pages | Court Fee |
| 1. | Memo of Parties | ||
| 2. | Summary Suit Under
Order XXXVII CPC for Recovery of Rs. 1,62,540/- with Pendentlite and Future Interest. |
||
| 3. | Affidavit in Support | ||
| 4. | List of Documents along
with Documents |
||
| 5. | Vakalatnama | ||
Filed By
(Avinash Nandan Sharma)
(Advocate )
Chamber No. 671, Patiala House Court
New Delhi-1
Place: Delhi
Date: .08.2015
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE,
SAKET COURTS, NEW DELHI
(Summary Suit under Order XXXVII , CPC)
SUIT NO._______________of 2015
IN THE MATTER OF:
M/s Myco Electricals Pvt. Ltd. …..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
M/S RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd. ..…DEFENDANT
MEMO OF PARTIES
M/s Myco Electricals Pvt. Ltd.
A-25, Nizamuddin West,
New Delhi-110013,
…..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
- M/s RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd.
MESCAB CENTRE
53A, Tiljala Road, Kolkata-700046,
West Bengal
- Rajesh Agarwala ,the Director / Proprietor
M/s RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd.
MESCAB CENTRE
53A, Tiljala Road, Kolkata-700046,
West Bengal
Also at
2B, Burdwan Road, Alipore
Kolkata700027 , West Bengal
..…DEFENDANTS
Filed by:
( Avinash Nandan Sharma )
(Advocate )
Chamber No. 671, Patiala House Court
New Delhi-1, Mob: 8800794128
Place: Delhi
Date: .08.2015
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE,
SAKET COURTS, NEW DELHI
(Summary Suit under Order XXXVII , CPC)
SUIT NO._______________of 2015
IN THE MATTER OF:
M/s Myco Electricals Pvt. Ltd.
A-25, Nizamuddin West,
New Delhi-110013,
…..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
- M/s RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd.
MESCAB CENTRE
53A, Tiljala Road, Kolkata-700046,
West Bengal
- Rajesh Agarwala ,the Director / Proprietor
M/s RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd.
MESCAB CENTRE
53A, Tiljala Road, Kolkata-700046,
West Bengal
Also at
2B, Burdwan Road, Alipore
Kolkata700027 , West Bengal
..…DEFENDANTS
SUMMARY SUIT UNDRE ORDER XXXVII CPC FOR RECOVERY OF RS. 1,62,540/- WITH PENDENTLITE AND FUTURE INTEREST
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-
- That the plaintiff is a Private Limited Company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at A-25 Nizamuddin West, New Delhi-13.
- That Sh. Sanjeev Kumar , Senior Manager of the plaintiff Company is authorized by the Board of Directors of the Plaintiff Company vide Board Resolution dated 07.2015 to initiate legal actions/ proceedings and / or any other legal proceeding(s) by or against M/s. Myco Electricals Pvt. Ltd. and to sign, verify and file plaint, applications, complaints, affidavits and to do all other acts, deeds and things necessary for the proper conduct and the proceedings of the present suit in all its stages. Sh. Sanjeev Kumar is otherwise also fully conversant with the facts of the case as per the information received and derived from the records and books of accounts of the Plaintiff Company, which is being maintained by the plaintiff Company in its regular course of business / activity and thus he is competent to depose and verify the facts.
- That the defendant No.1 is a proprietorship firm /company and engaged into the business running it under the name and style of M/s , RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd. from the above mentioned address. The defendant No. 2 is the proprietor of the defendant 1/Company /firm and in-charge of the day-to-day affairs of the said company/firm i.e. defendant no.1 and are solely liable and responsible for the debt and liability of the said firm / company.
- That defendants contacted the plaintiff through their representative for the sale of materials for which defendants sent a Performa invoice duly signed by the defendant no.2 as an authorized signatory dated 29th September 2012 to the plaintiff mentioning the sale amount of Rs. 7,55,050.46/- (Seven Lac fifty five thousand fifty rupees and forty six paisa only) for the supply of a fixed quantity of materials by you.
- That Defendant agreed to Performa Invoice of the defendant company and consented for the purchase of the agreed material. On 08.10.2012 Plaintiff made the payment of 7,55,050/- (Seven Lac fifty five thousand fifty rupees only) to the defendant by Central Bank of India through RTGS/ Bank Transfer. The copy of the Bank Statement of the plaintiff Company is attached in the List of Documents.
- That the defendant sent the material to the plaintiff through Consignee Copy bearing no. 8819 dated 06.11.2012 through S.S.C. Logistcs , a public transporter. However , the materials supplied by you was not of the quantity agreed between parties through Performa invoice dated 29.09.2012.
- That the defendant also sent the Tax Invoice and Excise Invoice of Rs. 5,92,510/- in total dated 06.11.2012 out of the already paid amount of Rs. 7,55,050/- through RTGS for considered transaction. Thus, defendants retained with themselves the mount of Rs. 1,62,540/- for which plaintiff many times called the defendant company but they neither sent the material nor returned the balance money of Rs.1,62,540/- to the plaintiff which shows malafide intention and unjust enrichment of the defendants.
- That when plaintiff tried to contact the defendants at this point they did not clear their stand and assured the plaintiff that they will examine the statement of account and do the needful. On the assurance of the defendants, the plaintiff kept waiting for their response, however, finally respondents did not take note of this matter which shows wrong intention of the defendant company.
- That the plaintiff has also suffered in its trade due to unprofessional response and illegal trade practice of the defendants by not complying the terms of agreement of sale – purchase and intentionally and illegally retaining 1,62,540/- ( One Lac sixty two thousand five hundred forty rupees only) with themselves which is due and payable by the defendant company to the plaintiff as per the Performa invoice and invoices given by the defendants to plaintiff and as per the ledger Account of defendant maintained by the plaintiff attached in the List of Documents.
- That inspite of the repeated request by the plaintiff copany as will its Lawyer, the defendant company has failed to make the payment. In this reagar attention is invited to legal notice dated 18.05.2015 sent through Lawyer, which was not even replied by the defendants. The copy of Legal Notice along with its proof of service is attached in the List of Documents.
- It is stated that the plaintiff is entitled to file the suit under Order XXXVII CPC and a decree of Rs.1,62,540/- is liable to be passed in its favour.
- That the cause of action for filing this present suit arose in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants when the defendants sent a Performa Invoice to the Plaintiff Company for supplying equipments on 29.09.2012 which was agreed and accepted by the plaintiff company and gave advance amount of Rs. 7,55,050/- through RTGS for considered transaction to the defendants. It further accrued on the dates when the defendant company supplied the lesser quantity of the equipment/materials to the plaintiffs on 06.11.2012. The cause of action further accrued when the Defendants failed to deliver outstanding amount upon receipt of written reminders and legal notice of Plaintiff Company. The Defendants have not returned or liquidated the outstanding amount till date. Therefore the cause of action still subsists and is continuing. Hence this suit.
- That the deal between the plaintiff and defendants was finalized at the office of the plaintiff at Delhi. The Plaintiff Company was supplied the equipment to Delhi by the defendants. The plaintiff has made advance payment for the agreed supply of materials to the Defendant Company at Delhi. The Legal Notice was issued to defendant form Delhi. Hence, this Hon’ble Court therefore has jurisdiction to entertain, try and dispose of this suit.
- That the suit has been filed within the period of limitation.
- That the value of the suit for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction is calculated at 1,62,540/- ( One Lac sixty two thousand five hundred fourty rupees only) on which the requisite Court fees has been affixed by the plaintiff.
- The plaintiff is filing this Suit Under Order XXXVII, CPC. No relief which does not fall within the ambit of Order XXXVII Rule 2 CPC has been claimed in the plaint.
- The plaintiff will rely on documents, a list whereof is attached hereto.
PRAYER
It is , therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court would be pleased to pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants for a sum of Rs. 1,62,540/- ( One Lac sixty two thousand five hundred forty rupees only) with pendetlite and future interest @ 18% per annum from the date of the decree till realization.
The cost of the suit be also awarded.
That any other relief(s) which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant.
PLAINTIFF
THROUGH
( Avinash Nandan Sharma )
(Advocate )
Chamber No. 671, Patiala House Court
New Delhi-1, Mob. 8800794128
Place: Delhi
Date: .08.2015
VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named Petitioner do hereby state and verify on solemn affirmation that the contents of Para No.1 to 10 of the above Plaint are true and correct to my knowledge and Para No.11 to17 are based on the information received and believed to be true. Last Para is prayer to this Hon’ble Court.
Verified at Delhi on this day of August 2015.
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE,
SAKET COURTS, NEW DELHI
(Summary Suit under Order XXXVII , CPC)
SUIT NO._______________of 2015
IN THE MATTER OF:
M/s Myco Electricals Pvt. Ltd. …..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
M/S RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd. ..…DEFENDANT
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sanjeev Kumar S/o. Sh. Manohar Lal , aged about 43 years,Senior Manger of the plaintiff Company having it office at A-25, Nizamuddin West, New Delhi-110013 , do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
- That I am plaintiff in the above case and am conversant with the facts of the case and competent to swear this affidavit.
- That the accompanying plaint as the Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII, has been drafted by my counsel under my instructions. The statements of facts contained therein are true and correct to my knowledge.
- That I am not repeating the contents of the accompanying petition herein for the sake of brevity and the same be read as part and parcel of this affidavit.
- That above is my true and correct statement.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named A.R. of the plaintiff do hereby verify that the contents of my above affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. No part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom
Verified at Delhi on this day of August. 2015.
DEPONENT
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE,
SAKET COURTS, NEW DELHI
(Summary Suit under Order XXXVII , CPC)
SUIT NO._______________of 2015
IN THE MATTER OF:
M/s Myco Electricals Pvt. Ltd. …..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
M/S RAS Foils & Packaging Pvt. Ltd. ..…DEFENDANT
List of Documents
- No. Particulars Page No.
- Certified true Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Of the Plaintiff Company.
- Certified true copy of Board Resolution dated
09.1.2015
- Copy of Performa Invoice dated 29.09.2012
- Consignee Copy of SSC Logistics dated 06.11.2012
- Copy of Packing Report dated 06.11.2012
- Copy of Tax Invoice and Excise Invoice
dated 06.11.2012
- Certified true copy of Ledger Account for
the period 1st April, 2012 to 28 August 2014.
- Copy of legal Notices dated 18.05.2012015
along with postal receipt.
PLAINTIFF
THROUGH
( Avinash Nandan Sharma)
(Advocate )
Chamber No. 671, Patiala House Court
New Delhi-1
Place: Delhi
Date: .08.2015
